⁣What About "Your" Eternity?

1

0

0

114

singing praise to Yah daily -lyrics always made on the fly 😆

4

0

0

139

In this video I am using an angle grinder to remove toxic paint from my anvil.

5

0

1

62

Sprouted buckwheat breading, pepperoni, seasoned mushrooms, dried tomatoes, super healthy!

8

0

1

160

⁣JEREMIAH 31:3
⁣Off the CRY OUT ALBUM 2021

1

0

0

14

⁣Scientists are calling her Eve, but reluctantly. The name evokes too many wrong images-- the weak-willed figure in Genesis, the milk-skinned beauty in Renaissance art, the voluptuary gardener in "Paradise Lost" who was all "softness" and "meek surrender" and waist-length "gold tresses." The scientists' Eve- subject of one of the most provocative anthropological theories in a decade- was more likely a dark-haired, black-skinned woman, roaming a hot savanna in search of food. She was as muscular as Martina Navratilova, maybe stronger; she might have torn animals apart with her hands, although she probably preferred to use stone tools. She was not the only woman on earth, nor necessarily the most attractive or maternal. She was simply the most fruitful if that is measured by success in propagating a particular set of genes. Hers seem to be in all humans living today: 5 billion blood relatives. She was, by one rough estimate, your 10,000th great-grandmother.

2

0

1

26